Today I participated in a beta test of video conferencing phase 2. It utilized audio, video, and web. The meeting had one dedicated endpoint in a large conference room and six webcams on both Macs and PCs. We had 11 people connected via audio only and 23 connected viewing the meeting desktop on their computers via the web.
While there are plenty of technical details to fine tune before going in to full production, the early test was a success. Participants from all around the US were able to effectively participate in the meeting without the expense or hassel of having to travel during the Christmas season. Online polling and chatting of questions/comments was more effective via the web than it would have been in person because people were not talking over each other, it was less time consuming, and a high percentage participated. The Macs seemed to have better video quality than the PCs and the older webcams had very poor quality. The audio quality was good, but I noticed that when people muted their microphones their body language appeared to show a lower level of engagement. An opportunity for improvement was in the area of desktop sharing. We could have shared more visual information to go along with the spoken word if all presenters and participants had been using the desktop.
When the details get worked out and this phase goes in to production, we will have capacity for the simultaneous use of 92 video ports, 220 audio ports, and 120 web ports.