“One person with passion is better than forty people merely interested” – E.M. Forester
Passion is an amazing emotion that unlocks incredible ability. People with passion refuse to give up and can overcome huge obstacles to turn intent into accomplishment. Passion can transform one person’s convictions in to a mass movement. Campus Crusade for Christ is a perfect example of that.
Passion, creativity, and initiative are gifts that people choose to give or withhold day by day and moment by moment. Engaging these gifts requires managing less not more. It means less directives, less checking up, and less bureaucracy. The more constricting the oversight, the less passionate people are going to be about their work and the less creativity and initiative they will give.
Inspiring people to give generously of their talents requires that they be entrusted with the mission and equipped with the tools, training, and systems to be successful. To succeed we must let go of the managerial paradigms of the industrial age and embrace new ways of leading that engage passion, creativity, and initiative. For example, most people are unlikely to get excited about a task that has been assigned to them versus one they choose for themselves. So why do we still assign tasks? Sure the work still needs to get done, but a highly committed team should be entrusted to communicate and voluntarily select tasks that accomplish the service levels, goals, and mission of the organization.
What do you think? Which environment would you most likely flourish in: one with high levels of managerial oversight or one where people are entrusted and equipped? What thoughts do you have about how the scope of people’s freedom should be broadened by managing less and entrusting more, without sacrificing service levels and accomplishments?



